Robert Malone poses a great question in his substack:
What is the role of science?
If science has “matured” to the point where it “can” change nature, should it?
In the 21st century, society has come to the point where they have allowed the scientific endeavor to operate under the premise that if a scientist can do something, he or she should be able to do that thing. I will say it outright. This is wrong and in some cases it is immoral.
As an example, let’s take the trans movement. This group of people believe that they have the right to change the biological reality of gender through the use of science and medicine. That scientists and physicians, working with the trans movement, have the right to remold society, to the point where gender is considered by many to be a fluid concept. This movement has found willing partners (and financial beneficiaries) in physicians, bio-tech, hospitals, big-tech and pharma who have profited tremendously from this movement by providing drugs, surgeries and services to the trans individual.
/snip
This concept of gender fluidity is tearing apart the very fabric of society without any evaluation of the scientific progress that has made it possible for this new concept to be pushed to the mainstream. Even worse, these globalized efforts are have been highjacked by transnational corporations, who are making billions off of pharmaceutical products to support what are largely scientific experiments being conducted on a massive scale on humanity across the world.
Sound familiar? Where have we seen this mentality and “medical (non)ethics” before?
This should not ever have been the role of science or medicine to enable this. It is evil, truly evil.
Creating a large minority of the population to look, act, speak and behave as a different gender is an experiment. It involves trying to change the very nature of biology. Physicians who are prescribing drugs to suppress hormones as well as the hormones themselves, to create an illusion of a different gender, are violating a sacred oath to do no harm. Physicians who are performing “cutting edge” surgeries that involve removing and modifying genitalia are harming people. It needs to stop.
/snip
But this is just one example. Other examples include:
- The injections of baby blood products into a wealthy elite population, so that they can live longer is occurring across the world
- Gain of function research to create new and different viruses continues throughout the world at a break-neck pace.
- Bioweapons development programs continue, with almost no oversight.
- The agricultural science of factory farming, which has created breeding grounds for new viruses and toxic bacterial strains, has become normalized.
- Then there are the weather modification programs, which governments are utilizing with increasing frequencies.
- There is even “talk” that head transplant research in humans continues to be conducted in China.
Science knows no bounds. Literally, it has no bounds. No moral or ethical guardrails.
Is a lack of morality in science an immorality? I believe resoundingly, the answer is yes.
There is no hippocratic oath for scientists or science.
/snip
Just because something can be done, that does not mean that it should be done. Pandora opened a jar left in her care containing sickness, death and many other unspecified evils which were then released into the world. In the absence of clear accepted boundaries between the possible and the ethical, once Pandora’s box has been opened, it becomes impossible to reverse the consequences.
/snip
…Those who advocate for a second bite of the apple demonstrate a profound, narcissistic lack of wisdom and perspective. It only takes one Pandora to destroy paradise. As both Robert Oppenheimer and Robert Malone have learned, once the genie has left the bottle, the Jinn travels on the wind and can never be returned. The consequences cannot be predicted.
Oh, and Happy Valentine’s Day to all!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.