Friday “Diggin’ in the Dirt” Recovery Open Comments

Okay, I’m a little sore and moving a little slowly today. I’ve actually swept the floor and made the tea. Sugar’s on the table. I think I’m going to sit down for a while now…come on in and make yourselves at home.
What “dirt” shall we discuss? Charlie Sheen shutting down “Two and Half Men” with his bad behavior, putting hundreds of people out of work? Libyan leader on the run? Obama partying down while the Middle East melts?
So many topics, so little time…but we’ll manage, I’m sure.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Darren
Darren
February 26, 2011 12:11 am

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) – Virginia took a big step Thursday toward eliminating most of the state’s 21 abortion clinics, approving a bill that would likely make rules so strict the medical centers would be forced to close, Democrats and abortion rights supporters said.

That should make bob happy. It makes me happy.
LINK

Darren
Darren
February 26, 2011 12:05 am

Do you realize that your two numbered arguments above are exactly what defenders of arranged marriages still offer in support of that archaic and demonstrably unfair tradition? When Mrs. Darren and I met, it was like we were “pre-picked” to meet and fall in love. Actually, I couldn’t stand her when we first met. Very annoying. What are the divorce… Read more »

Darren
Darren
February 26, 2011 12:01 am

As for your #2, I do not think that you or anyone else, singularly or in mobs have a “right” to empower and direct our government to purposefully disadvantage some free associations while simultaneously favoring others. While mobs scream in wisconsin, do not compare me to them. If you can show me the civilization that has thrived as blessed as… Read more »

bob42
February 25, 2011 9:17 pm

Darren, as I said above, I think religious organizations should be, and are free to define/recognize/sanctify marriage as they see fit. As for your #2, I do not think that you or anyone else, singularly or in mobs have a “right” to empower and direct our government to purposefully disadvantage some free associations while simultaneously favoring others. Do you realize… Read more »

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 8:51 pm

bob;
1) No civilization survives allowing any person to be “married”.
2) People have every right to define marriage.
It’s as easy as that.

bob42
February 25, 2011 8:44 pm

I’ll pass the pats along to my cat.

bob42
February 25, 2011 8:33 pm

Thanks Tedtam, I appreciate the good intentions, maybe.
Do let me know when the facts support the impeachment of a president over this historically convenient partisan wedge non-issue.

bob42
February 25, 2011 7:50 pm

#39 Darren, I recognize and respect the rights of free associations that are called religious organizations to recognize and define whatever they like. I think government at every level should treat associations between free people equally under the law. Government should not have the power to favor some associations over others, regardless of how many opportunistic politicians find benefit from… Read more »

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 7:12 pm

bob; States have the right to define marriage. DOMA tried to bridge the gap between allowing states to define marriage and not force states to accept other state’s marriage not permitted within their own state. A constitutional amendment would be far better (unless people like you use a fderal judge to nullify it and there’s too many political wimps to… Read more »

bob42
February 25, 2011 7:03 pm

Darren, please show me where the constitution gives the government the power to define marriage. Also, if you don’t mind, can you state any ills that the existence of DOMA has prevented. Really, is it a necessary law? Is it helpful in any way? The law was constitutionally weak from it’s inception. It’s name title gives credence to the term… Read more »

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:59 pm
Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:43 pm

Bonecrusher #21;

How do you make an old lady drop the “F” bomb?
Have the old lady next to her yell “BINGO!!”

I didn’t know you met Mrs. Darren’s great grandmother before she passed away.

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:41 pm

Super Dave;
Yo, that there #22 post is awesome!!! 😉

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:40 pm

bob #31;

And btw, that’s ex-wife’s panties.

I do stand corrected.

Adee
February 25, 2011 6:39 pm

The I-word has been lurking in the hearts of thousands for a long time. That it spills out now and again is not a shock but rather a relief to realize those who think it are not alone.

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:38 pm

bob; Nobody declared anything unconstitutional, despite how many time you may have heard that talking point repeated. OK. Attorney General Eric Holder said President Barack Obama has concluded that the administration cannot defend the federal law that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman. He noted that the congressional debate during passage of the Defense of Marriage… Read more »

bob42
February 25, 2011 6:32 pm

#30 Super Dave, been there and done that earlier today. Write your congress critter if you support impeachment.
#29 Darren, perish the thought!

Bob would also soil his wife’s panties

And btw, that’s ex-wife’s panties. 😉

Super Dave
Super Dave
February 25, 2011 6:23 pm

#29 Darren Pssst, scroll up to my #22. 😉

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions, There Would Be Calls for Impeachment Finally, something from Gingrich that I like. “Imagine that Governor Palin had become president. Imagine that she had announced that Roe versus Wade in her view was unconstitutional and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had… Read more »

Darren
Darren
February 25, 2011 6:07 pm

bob;
If you want to continue arguing about DOMA, link HERE, and HERE.

bob42
February 25, 2011 5:54 pm

#25 The president does not defend laws in courts.
#26 Nobody declared anything unconstitutional, despite how many time you may have heard that talking point repeated.

Sarge
February 25, 2011 4:40 pm

Bob
Its time for you to provide the most recent example of a President saying he will not defend a law in court.

bob42
February 25, 2011 4:25 pm

#22 I would expect a former speaker of the house to know the difference between enforcement and the latitude that every justice department in every administration in our lifetimes has exercised in prioritizing what cases they support and the extent to which they do. This is nothing new, at all. …not to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage law has… Read more »

Super Dave
Super Dave
February 25, 2011 3:35 pm

Gingrich: Obama Sparks ‘Constitutional Crisis,’ Raises Impeachment Specter. In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV Friday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said President Barack Obama’s decision not to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage law has sparked a constitutional crisis as he has directly violated his constitutional duties by arbitrarily suspending a law. Gingrich for the first time raised the specter… Read more »

Bonecrusher
Bonecrusher
February 25, 2011 3:06 pm

How do you make an old lady drop the “F” bomb?
Have the old lady next to her yell “BINGO!!”

Super Dave
Super Dave
February 25, 2011 2:30 pm

Charo: Lady Gaga Is Madonna With Diarrhea.
I didn’t know that she Charo was still around.

mharper42
mharper42
February 25, 2011 1:01 pm

General Hummer leads Pentagon‘s Repeal Implementation team as DA-DT sensitivity training starts on the battlefield. 🙂
Wow. Just what we need as the Middle East goes up in flames.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/feb/24/combat-troops-to-get-gay-sensitivity-training/?page=1
h/t: Drudge

bob42
February 25, 2011 12:29 pm

These were the rules of the Art and Evolution contest: Imagine an island with a unique environment. Choose an existing animal to put on the island. Fast forward a million years or so and imagine how the animal would evolve as a result of that environment. Draw a picture of the evolved animal. The 7 year old future scientist that… Read more »

Bonecrusher
Bonecrusher
February 25, 2011 11:51 am

There is just no talking with a mind as closed as yours.

Hey Sarge, try looking in the mirror.

bob42
February 25, 2011 11:50 am

Self-fulfilling prophecy: Merton’s concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy stems from the Thomas theorem, which states that “If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.” According to Thomas, people react not only to the situations they are in, but also, and often primarily, to the way they perceive the situations and to the meaning they assign to… Read more »

Sarge
February 25, 2011 11:26 am

Bonesy I’m done with you on this subject Milosovik was a blood thirsty animal who had no excuse whatseover to murder and rape. he was not responding to any musklim violence. He was the perpetrator and instigator. He was not railroaded. He was as guilty as sin and is roastinf in Hell, which is where everybody with his kind of… Read more »

mharper42
mharper42
February 25, 2011 11:23 am

From Drudge: Mayo enters politics… or is it vice versa ?
http://www.politico.com/click/stories/1102/in_ad_carville_hawks_miracle_whip.html

texanadian
texanadian
February 25, 2011 11:22 am
Bonecrusher
Bonecrusher
February 25, 2011 11:15 am

Sarge: Let me make a few statements of position: 1. I do not believe that each and every moooslim is a violent, blood thirsty savage. That being said, enough of them are that to ignore that reality is playing russian roulette. 2. Slobo was responding to moooslim church burning, murder and rape. That is a fact. Did he go way… Read more »

Sarge
February 25, 2011 10:40 am

I did. And my mind is plenty broad. But when you claimed that Slobon Milosovik was railroaded into being convicted of war crimes, you showed me that yours isn’t. Whe you made him the victim and gave him an excuse for committing the genocide and organized rape of muslims in Boznia Herzegovina you showed me that hyour attitude is that… Read more »

Bonecrusher
Bonecrusher
February 25, 2011 10:08 am

Sarge: Please read my #128 on yesterday’s o/c thread (posted this am). Please study the links with an open mind.

texanadian
texanadian
February 25, 2011 9:39 am

Rush exposes the msm, like as if that was hard.
http://www.therightscoop.com/rush-exposes-msm-bias-imagine-president-palin
#7 Super Dave: I saw that on, I believe, the Twilight Zone when I was a wee pup. I think about it frequently and have told the story to others to make a point. Thanks for bringing it to us.

Super Dave
Super Dave
February 25, 2011 9:28 am

A man and his dog were walking along a road. The man was enjoying the scenery, when it suddenly occurred to him that he was dead. He remembered dying, and that the dog walking beside him had been dead for years. He wondered where the road was leading them. After a while, they came to a high, white stone wall… Read more »

Dooood
February 25, 2011 9:10 am

I vote we make Sarge the official Hamster Music Czar.
🙂

Sarge
February 25, 2011 9:04 am

I’ve never been big on the whole music thread thing, but I’ll see what I can do. It seems that my cohorts in crime are also late coming to work.

There’s history and tradition involved.
It all started as Zappa Friday, until we ran out of Zappa tunes.

Sarge
February 25, 2011 9:03 am

Recall petitions already being circulated for 7 of the Wisconsin Fleebaggers.
The Unions are mulling over whether or not they will mount a similar effort agains some Republicans.
It will be interesting to see who gets more signatures, and who is successful.
Which is why the Unions might not want to do it.

Sarge
February 25, 2011 8:59 am

If i had Admin privelges, there’d already be a Music Thread.
Just sayin–

100
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x