Cut Spending Now, While There is Still a Mandate

Now that the Republicans have won control of the House of Representatives, where all spending must originate, we have an excellent opportunity for serious spending reduction.  Our friends at Cato posted a list of different spending plans that reduce spending by between $120 and $476 billion per year.

The plan by the National Taxpayers Union is vague and not very aggressive at only $600 billion over 5 years. Its biggest item at $354 billion is the old “eliminate waste/make government more efficient.” I personally believe there’s a lot more than that, but have yet to see any evidence that anyone is serious about actually capturing any savings from that avenue.

Heritage offers many more specifics and appears much more serious, offering savings of $343 billion per year. Their plan includes privatizing some government activities, devolving other activities to the states, and substituting vouchers for direct subsidies. It also eliminates or sharply reduces several other programs.

The “Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget” reduces and eliminates several programs, has some nebulous “across the board” spending reductions, but raises taxes on carbon emissions.

Esquire commissioned a plan that includes spending cut, etc., but lots of “revenue enhancements”. Most of its spending cuts appear fairly nonserious until you get to their “other spending” category. Even there, the plan seems vague at times (e.g., reduce farm subsidies) or eliminates pretty small amounts of money.

When reading these, I asked myself what I would do.

  • Eliminate all programs created and spending increases made since 2007. My thought is that the Republic survived for well over 200 years without these expenditures, so we can surely continue without them.
  • Reduce the Federal workforce by 10% in every agency and department by the end of FY2011. This doesn’t mean merely reducing headcount by 10%, it means reducing Federal payroll by 10%. Uniformed military would be exempt.
  • Freeze salaries and benefits for the remaining Federal workforce for a period of at least five years and cap its growth to the same rate of inflation used for Social Security COLAs.
  • Eliminate the Federal Department of Education. Cut the USDA by half (personnel and budget).
  • Cap welfare programs to a maximum of two years in any ten year period for all able-bodied recipients.
  • Implement a national sales tax at a rate that would match current income tax receipts. Failing that, institute a minimum 5% income tax rate on all workers, leaving other rates intact.
  • Eliminate all “Community Development” activities.
  • Eliminate all subsidies.
  • Charge the beneficiaries of all “trade promotion” programs amounts greater than the expenditures.
  • Repeal Davis-Bacon.
  • Eliminate all “arts” programs.

These measures may not be easy and I don’t know how much money they might save, but they are certainly well within the expense reduction parameters private industry has generally had to live with. I have seen large companies make significantly greater reductions (on a proportional basis) several times in my career. The time has come for everyone to realize that we cannot continue spending at this rate for very long before we turn into a banana republic.


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

44 responses to “Cut Spending Now, While There is Still a Mandate”

  1. Tedtam Avatar

    Well, it’s a start. There will wailing and gnashing of teeth. We have to have waves politicians willing to serve one term to be serious about this stuff.

    That, or a really good education program for the masses. A series of PSAs that explain how the economy works (Capitalism 101), how our government budget is SUPPOSED to work, and it wouldn’t hurt to have a few lessons on the Constitution, either.

  2. Tedtam Avatar

    Well, it’s a start. There will wailing and gnashing of teeth. We have to have waves politicians willing to serve one term to be serious about this stuff.

    That, or a really good education program for the masses. A series of PSAs that explain how the economy works (Capitalism 101), how our government budget is SUPPOSED to work, and it wouldn’t hurt to have a few lessons on the Constitution, either.

  3. Katfish Avatar

    I forgot one thing –
    Reform government retiree pensions. Buy out everyone’s pensions and place the proceeds in an IRA. People would retire when they wanted and could afford to, just like everyone in the private sector. Retiree health care plans would be eliminated. Uniformed military would be exempt from this.

  4. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    I forgot one thing –
    Reform government retiree pensions. Buy out everyone’s pensions and place the proceeds in an IRA. People would retire when they wanted and could afford to, just like everyone in the private sector. Retiree health care plans would be eliminated. Uniformed military would be exempt from this.

  5. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    As long as idiots like Paul Krugman have the president’s ear none of this will ever get done.

  6. Hamous Avatar

    As long as idiots like Paul Krugman have the president’s ear none of this will ever get done.

  7. Adee Avatar
    Adee

    Lots of good digging, wagonburner. Lots of thoughtful proposals on your part.

    Umm—clarification needed on the national sales tax suggestion–the income tax must be repealed simultaneously. Presume that is what was meant, but some folks might read it as having both. In the alternative to the sales tax, the minimum 5% income tax on all workers is a great move–everybody needs skin in the game.

  8. Adee Avatar
    Adee

    Lots of good digging, wagonburner. Lots of thoughtful proposals on your part.

    Umm—clarification needed on the national sales tax suggestion–the income tax must be repealed simultaneously. Presume that is what was meant, but some folks might read it as having both. In the alternative to the sales tax, the minimum 5% income tax on all workers is a great move–everybody needs skin in the game.

  9. Hamous Avatar

    #2 Pyro: One small problem is how much do you “buy out” their plans with? How much do you have to put in to “fund” the plan?? I suggest that a full funding is unreasonable as their pay and benefits are unreasonable as compared to the private sector. I think a fair buy out would be something on the order of 1 month of pay for every year over 5 years to a maximum of 20 pay years.

  10. Bonecrusher Avatar
    Bonecrusher

    #2 Pyro: One small problem is how much do you “buy out” their plans with? How much do you have to put in to “fund” the plan?? I suggest that a full funding is unreasonable as their pay and benefits are unreasonable as compared to the private sector. I think a fair buy out would be something on the order of 1 month of pay for every year over 5 years to a maximum of 20 pay years.

  11. Katfish Avatar

    #4 adee
    Your presumption is correct.

  12. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    #4 adee
    Your presumption is correct.

  13. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    One thing I want is the option for me to opt out of Social Security and take my 7% and put it into my 401K. That way the government cannot waste it.

    Also limit get it passed that from this point on Federal organizations must request a separate appropriation if they want to increase their budget beyond the SS/COLA increase. That way they come before congress with their hand out and have to prove that they need the extra $$..

  14. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    One thing I want is the option for me to opt out of Social Security and take my 7% and put it into my 401K. That way the government cannot waste it.

    Also limit get it passed that from this point on Federal organizations must request a separate appropriation if they want to increase their budget beyond the SS/COLA increase. That way they come before congress with their hand out and have to prove that they need the extra $$..

  15. Katfish Avatar

    #5 boney
    There are many examples of private companies buying out employee pensions over the past 20 years. I would think a typical example could be used as a template.

  16. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    #5 boney
    There are many examples of private companies buying out employee pensions over the past 20 years. I would think a typical example could be used as a template.

  17. Adee Avatar
    Adee

    I like the Hertiage Foundation position. Heritage Foundation was instrumental in helping create the successful Reagan fiscal policy.

  18. Adee Avatar
    Adee

    I like the Hertiage Foundation position. Heritage Foundation was instrumental in helping create the successful Reagan fiscal policy.

  19. El Gordo Avatar

    All good cut suggestions, Wagonburner, and I’d support every one of them. But the biggest budget problem is SS, Medicare and Medicaid, which I’m given to understand represent roughly 3/4 of the budget. I would think that a gradual, stepped phasing out of those programs for people under the age of 55 could work fiscally, but realistically the wailing and gnashing of teeth might make it darn near impossible to accomplish politically. If we don’t address it however, the eventual consequences are going to be that much more painful when it all comes crashing down.

  20. The Dude Avatar

    All good cut suggestions, Wagonburner, and I’d support every one of them. But the biggest budget problem is SS, Medicare and Medicaid, which I’m given to understand represent roughly 3/4 of the budget. I would think that a gradual, stepped phasing out of those programs for people under the age of 55 could work fiscally, but realistically the wailing and gnashing of teeth might make it darn near impossible to accomplish politically. If we don’t address it however, the eventual consequences are going to be that much more painful when it all comes crashing down.

  21. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    There are many examples of private companies buying out employee pensions over the past 20 years.

    My company did it in 1988 when they realized there was a large slug of old-timers fixing to retire all at the same time.

  22. Hamous Avatar

    There are many examples of private companies buying out employee pensions over the past 20 years.

    My company did it in 1988 when they realized there was a large slug of old-timers fixing to retire all at the same time.

  23. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    If we don’t address it however, the eventual consequences are going to be that much more painful when it all comes crashing down.

    Yeah, well, when the ETs invade it will all be a moot point 😉

    Along those lines, a strange thing happened at Mass last Sunday. Right before the Penitential Rite the priest (who is always a bit quirky) called for a moment of silence to meditate on why we shouldn’t concern ourselves with the 2012 end-of-the-world hype. People were looking around at each other with a “what the heck is he even talking about” gaze.

  24. Hamous Avatar

    If we don’t address it however, the eventual consequences are going to be that much more painful when it all comes crashing down.

    Yeah, well, when the ETs invade it will all be a moot point 😉

    Along those lines, a strange thing happened at Mass last Sunday. Right before the Penitential Rite the priest (who is always a bit quirky) called for a moment of silence to meditate on why we shouldn’t concern ourselves with the 2012 end-of-the-world hype. People were looking around at each other with a “what the heck is he even talking about” gaze.

  25. El Gordo Avatar

    Yeah, well, when the ETs invade it will all be a moot point

    I don’t know Hammy, they’ll likely want their cut from Uncle Sugar as well. 🙂

    Seriously though, entitlement spending is increasing now at a rate that has the capacity to sink us. Unchecked, it could become quite ugly.

    http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/25/news-flash-entitlement-spendin

    BTW, my 3/4 figure was off, but not by much. In a few years it could easily pass that.

  26. The Dude Avatar

    Yeah, well, when the ETs invade it will all be a moot point

    I don’t know Hammy, they’ll likely want their cut from Uncle Sugar as well. 🙂

    Seriously though, entitlement spending is increasing now at a rate that has the capacity to sink us. Unchecked, it could become quite ugly.

    http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/25/news-flash-entitlement-spendin

    BTW, my 3/4 figure was off, but not by much. In a few years it could easily pass that.

  27. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    #12, Hamous, remember it takes all types. 🙂

    I am just glad he is not my pastor.

  28. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    #12, Hamous, remember it takes all types. 🙂

    I am just glad he is not my pastor.

  29. Katfish Avatar

    (who is always a bit quirky)

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    What parish?

  30. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    (who is always a bit quirky)

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    What parish?

  31. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    Dude,

    it is time to wean the child from the teat of the mother, or government as it is. The funny thing is I knew a woman who was still breast feeding her 2 yr old child.

  32. bweldon Avatar
    bweldon

    Dude,

    it is time to wean the child from the teat of the mother, or government as it is. The funny thing is I knew a woman who was still breast feeding her 2 yr old child.

  33. Katfish Avatar

    Regardind pensions/spending, I think California has just set the stage for creating an object lesson in what might happen. Passage of Prop 25 made it much easier for them to continue their deficit spending by reducing the requirement for passage of a budget to a simple majority from a 2/3 majority. CALsters (the teacher pension fund) is in the process of lowering its rate of return for planning from 8% to 7.5% (IIRC); this has an immediate effect of showing the fund to be even more underfunded than it already is, meaning that even more additional funds will be required to properly fund it. They also elected Captain Moonbeam as their new Governor.

    The Libs make the point that the last time California ran a surplus, Brown was governor. That may be true, but when he was governor, public employees were not unionized and the regulatory burden was virtually nonexistent compared to now.

    Collapses (of all kinds – structural, economic, civil) generally start slowly, often imperceptibly, then at some point very rapidly pick up speed and nothing can stop them. This point of no return may be before the impending collapse is even noticed, or it may be when the collapse is well underway and everybody knows it.

    We’re seeing the signs of an imminent collapse in California – very poor economic activity in a place that should be booming, high taxes, poor governmental services, the more economically successful companies and people leaving in droves, illegals and the poor flocking there to take advantage of available social services.

    The signs that it will begin rapidly accelerating will likely be that interest rates on its bonds start climbing, probably quickly, tax revenues decline even more quickly, especially if/as other regions begin to experience growth, and the exodus of the successful accelerate.

    Confirmation will be that the political class starts asking Washington for bailouts. Hopefully, the GOP will tell them to get real and deal with their own problems. If they decide to bail them out, we may see a civil tipping point in the rest of the country. As sovereign entities, states cannot declare bankruptcy; they simply default on their obligations. I would be very reluctant to invest in California bonds at this point.

    Hopefully we can use California as an object lesson.

  34. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    Regardind pensions/spending, I think California has just set the stage for creating an object lesson in what might happen. Passage of Prop 25 made it much easier for them to continue their deficit spending by reducing the requirement for passage of a budget to a simple majority from a 2/3 majority. CALsters (the teacher pension fund) is in the process of lowering its rate of return for planning from 8% to 7.5% (IIRC); this has an immediate effect of showing the fund to be even more underfunded than it already is, meaning that even more additional funds will be required to properly fund it. They also elected Captain Moonbeam as their new Governor.

    The Libs make the point that the last time California ran a surplus, Brown was governor. That may be true, but when he was governor, public employees were not unionized and the regulatory burden was virtually nonexistent compared to now.

    Collapses (of all kinds – structural, economic, civil) generally start slowly, often imperceptibly, then at some point very rapidly pick up speed and nothing can stop them. This point of no return may be before the impending collapse is even noticed, or it may be when the collapse is well underway and everybody knows it.

    We’re seeing the signs of an imminent collapse in California – very poor economic activity in a place that should be booming, high taxes, poor governmental services, the more economically successful companies and people leaving in droves, illegals and the poor flocking there to take advantage of available social services.

    The signs that it will begin rapidly accelerating will likely be that interest rates on its bonds start climbing, probably quickly, tax revenues decline even more quickly, especially if/as other regions begin to experience growth, and the exodus of the successful accelerate.

    Confirmation will be that the political class starts asking Washington for bailouts. Hopefully, the GOP will tell them to get real and deal with their own problems. If they decide to bail them out, we may see a civil tipping point in the rest of the country. As sovereign entities, states cannot declare bankruptcy; they simply default on their obligations. I would be very reluctant to invest in California bonds at this point.

    Hopefully we can use California as an object lesson.

  35. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    #16 bweldon
    ick

  36. wagonburner Avatar
    wagonburner

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    Nah, he’s an older priest and sort of old school. Very passionate about the Word but sometimes goes off on tangents like this. Kids don’t like him because, unlike the head priest, he doesn’t invite the kids up during the Our Father. Another thing that bugs me is he insists that everyone put down their missalettes when he reads the Gospel. I know it’s not what he’s doing but it just reinforces the old stereotype that Catholics aren’t allowed to read the Bible. He’s also one of those that chants everything in the Mass.

  37. Hamous Avatar

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    Nah, he’s an older priest and sort of old school. Very passionate about the Word but sometimes goes off on tangents like this. Kids don’t like him because, unlike the head priest, he doesn’t invite the kids up during the Our Father. Another thing that bugs me is he insists that everyone put down their missalettes when he reads the Gospel. I know it’s not what he’s doing but it just reinforces the old stereotype that Catholics aren’t allowed to read the Bible. He’s also one of those that chants everything in the Mass.

  38. OletimerLin Avatar
    OletimerLin

    I think I’ll run this by the choir.

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    We’ve all worn Hawaiian shirts before. I think it could fly.

  39. bob42 Avatar

    I think I’ll run this by the choir.

    Is he one of those loons with the tie-dyed vestments?

    We’ve all worn Hawaiian shirts before. I think it could fly.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.